MCDB
4426 - Spring 2009
Cell signaling and developmental regulation
B121 of Porter Biosciences,
Tuesdays/Thursdays, 2:00-3:15 PM
Lecturer:
Dr. Ding Xue
E-mail: ding.xue@colorado.edu
Syllabus:
Jan-13 Tues. Introduction
lecture: Course organization, general introduction, goals of the
class and roles of cell signaling events. PPT
Recommended
reading material: Chapter 15 (Cell Communication) in Molecular Biology of the
Cell by Alberts et al. 2002, 4th Edition. Review other chapters as you
need. This book is very useful for this class. In addition, we will
use the i-clicker system to foster discussions during some of the lectures and
paper discussions. If you have an i-clicker, please bring it to the class. If
you donŐt have one, please buy one from the CU Bookstore or borrow one.
Cell Signaling in C. elegan embryonic development
Jan-15 Thurs.
Lecture: Embryo Development.
PPT
Read Alberts Book Page 1050-1059, page 1114-1119, page
1067-1070, page 1077–1102, to have an idea about various organisms.
Han M (1997). Gut Reaction to Wnt Signaling in Worms. Cell 90, 581-584. PDF
Jan-20 Tues. Paper
Discussion
Goldstein B (1992). Induction of gut in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nature 357:255-257. PDF PPT
Jan-22 Thurs. Paper Discussion
Mello CC, Draper BW, Priess JR (1994). The maternal genes apx-1 and glp-1 and
establishment of dorsal-ventral polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Cell 77:95-106. PDF
Jan-27 Tues. Paper Discussion
Thorpe CJ, Schlesinger A, Carter JC, Bowerman B (1997). Wnt
signaling polarizes an early C. elegans blastomere to distinguish endoderm from
mesoderm. Cell 90:695-705. PDF
Notch Pathway
Read the following reviews:
Fiza UM, Arias AM (2007). Cell and molecular biology of
Notch. J Endocrinol
194:459-474. PDF
Bray SJ (2006). Notch signalling: a simple
pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev
Mol Cell Biol. 7:678-689. PDF
Jan-29 Thurs. Paper Discussion
Struhl G, Fitzgerald K, Greenwald I (1993). Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and
Notch intracellular domains in vivo.
Cell 74:331-45. PDF
Feb-3 Tues. Paper Discussion
Levitan D, Greenwald I (1995). Facilitation of
lin-12-mediated signalling by sel-12, a Caenorhabditis elegans S182 Alzheimer's
disease gene. Nature 377:351-354. PDF
Feb-5 Thurs. Paper Discussion
Pan D, Rubin GM (1997). Kuzbanian controls proteolytic processing of Notch and
mediates lateral inhibition during Drosophila and vertebrate neurogenesis. Cell
90:271-280. PDF
Feb-10 Tues. Paper
Discussion
Mumm JS et al (2001). A ligand-induced extracellular cleavage regulates
gamma-secretase-like proteolytic activation of Notch1.
Mol Cell 5:197-206. PDF
Small RNA-mediated cell signaling
Read the following review:
Mello CC and Conte D (2004). Revealing the world
of RNA interference. Nature
431:338-342. PDF
Feb-12 Thurs. Paper Discussion
Fire A et al (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded
RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Nature 391:806-811. PDF
Feb-17 Tues. Paper Discussion
Bernstein E et al. (2001). Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in
the initiation step of RNA interference.
Nature 409:363-366. PDF
Feb-19 Thurs. Paper Discussion
Elbashir et al. (2001). Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in
cultured mammalian cells.
Nature 411:494-498.
PDF
Feb-24 Tues. Lecture:
Overview of programmed cell death and its genetic basis. PPT
Readings: Danial, N. N., and Korsmeyer,
S. J. (2004). Cell death: critical control points. Cell 116, 205-219. PDF
Adams,
J. M. (2003). Ways of dying: multiple pathways to apoptosis. Genes Dev 17,
2481-2495. PDF
Feb-26 Thurs. Paper Discussion: Genetic basis of PCD I –
Genetic identification of cell death genes
Hedgecock, E. M.,
Sulston, J. E., and Thomson, J. N. (1983). Mutations affecting programmed cell
deaths in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 220, 1277-1279. PDF
Mar-3 Tues. Paper Discussion: Genetic basis of
PCD II – Genetic identification of cell death genes
Ellis,
H. M., and Horvitz, H. R. (1986). Genetic control of programmed cell death in
the nematode C. elegans. Cell 44, 817-829. PDF
Take home exam (exam questions will be distributed by e-mail on
March 6 and please return your answers in four days)
Mar-5 Thurs. Paper Discussion: Biochemical basis of PCD I
Liu,
X., Kim, C. N., Yang, J., Jemmerson, R., and Wang, X. (1996). Induction of
apoptotic program in cell-free extracts: requirement for dATP and cytochrome
c. Cell 86, 147-157. PDF
TGF-§ signaling pathway (Taught by Dr.
Xuedong Liu)
Read the following reviews:
Clarke,
D.C. and Liu, X. (2008). Decoding the quantitative nature of TGF-beta/Smad
signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 18:430-442.
PDF
Massagu J
(1998). TGF-beta signal
transduction. Annu Rev Biochem.
67:753-791. PDF
Mar-10 Tues. Lecture PPT
Mar-12 Thurs. Paper discussion:
Inman GJ,
Nicols FJ, Hill CS (2002). Nucleocytoplasmic
shuttling of Smads 2, 3, and 4 permits sensing of TGF-beta receptor
activity. Mol Cell
10:283-294. PDF
Mar-17 Tues. Paper Discussion:
Lin et al.
(2006). PPM1A functions as a Smad
phosphatase to terminate TGFbeta signaling. Cell 125:915-928. PDF
Mar-19 Thurs. Paper Discussion: Biochemical basis of PCD II
Zou,
H., Henzel, W. J., Liu, X., Lutschg, A., and Wang, X. (1997). Apaf-1, a human
protein homologous to C. elegans CED-4, participates in cytochrome c-dependent
activation of caspase-3. Cell 90, 405-413. PDF
Mar-31 Tues. Lecture:
Life vs. death responses of a cell to extracellular signals. PPT
Readings:
Nagata S (1997). Apoptosis by death factors. Cell 88:
355-365. PDF
Apr-2 Thurs.
Paper Discussion: Signals for
death I-- Fas/TNF-induced apoptosis
Chinnaiyan
AM, O'Rourke K, Tewari M, Dixit VM (1995). FADD, a novel death
domain-containing protein, interacts with the death domain of Fas and initiates
apoptosis. Cell 81: 505-512.
PDF
Arp-7 Tues. Paper
Discussion: Signals for death
II—Caspase cascade
Muzio
et al. (1996). FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is
recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death--inducing signaling complex. Cell
85: 817-827. PDF
Apr-9 Thurs.
Paper
Discussion: Signals for death
III—Cell surface to mitochondria to caspase activation
Luo,
X., Budihardjo, I., Zou, H., Slaughter, C., and Wang, X. (1998). Bid, a
Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c release from mitochondria in
response to activation of cell surface death receptors. Cell 94,
481-490. PDF
Li,
H., Zhu, H., Xu, C.J., and Yuan, J. (1998). Cleavage of BID by caspase 8
mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway of apoptosis. Cell 94,
491-501. PDF
Apr-14
Tues. Paper
Discussion: Signals for death
IV—Genotoxic stresses.
Nijhawan
D, Fang M, Traer E, Zhong Q, Gao W, Du F, Wang X (2003). Elimination of Mcl-1 is required for
the initiation of apoptosis following ultraviolet irradiation. Genes Dev. 17:1475-1486. PDF
Apr-16 Thurs. Lecture:
Signals for removal of apoptotic cells. PPT
Readings: Conradt, B. and
Xue, D. (2005). Programmed cell death. WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community. WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.32.1. PDF
Savill, J., and
Fadok, V. (2000). Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death. Nature 407,
784-788. PDF
Apr-21 Tues. Discussion: Signals for death V-- Pathways for the
removal of dead cells.
Zhou,
Z., Hartwieg, E., and Horvitz, H. R. (2001). CED-1 is a transmembrane receptor
that mediates cell corpse engulfment in C. elegans. Cell 104, 43-56. PDF
Apr-23 Thurs. Discussion: Signals for death VI-- Pathways for the removal of dead
cells.
Wang
et al. (2003). Cell Corpse Engulfment Mediated by C. elegans Phosphatidylserine Receptor
Through CED-5 and CED-12. Science 302, 1563-1566.
PDF
Apr-28 Tues. Prepare for the
final exam.
Apr-30 Thurs. TBD.
Requirements for
students:
This is a
different kind of course from those you have taken earlier. This course
is designed to teach students the experimental approaches to solve scientific
problems. Students will learn how a scientific problem is raised and how
the problem is approached. This goal will be achieved by:
1.
The lectures will not simply be stating the facts. The scientific thinking
process will be introduced to the students. The students are required to
read some research papers/review articles/book chapters before or after each
lectures. These articles will be made available to the students on the
course website.
2.
There will be oral presentations and discussions about original research papers
by each student during the semester. The oral presentation and discussion
will include the followings: (a) the background of the research, (b) the
questions that the paper addressed, (c) all figures and tables, (d) discussion
of key research experiments, (e) conclusions from the results, and (f)
additional or future experiments that can be pursued. Each paper should
be read and discussed by all students. I will randomly pick a student or
students can volunteer to lead the one of the discussions. Alternatively, I will display i-clicker
questions for the whole class to discuss.
Each article should be
read carefully and critically by all students before the presentation/discussion
sessions.
3.
The students are required to actively participate in the discussions. In
the presentation and discussion sessions, the discussion will be focused on the
papers presented. Students are also encouraged to ask questions
throughout the lectures. You will learn from papers, lectures, paper
presentations of your own and your classmates.
4.
The students are required to take two exams (in class or take home) during the
semester.
5.
Reading related chapters from several cell biology or developmental biology
textbooks should help. Molecular Biology of
the Cell by Alberts et al. (2002) is one of the best. You may copy
just related chapters, or it is available in searchable format online at the
PubMed site (in the books section). For the best results, try to do
relevant reading before the classes and after. For some sessions,
particularly those presentation/discussion sessions, advanced reading is
required.
The
required readings are original research articles and some review articles.
References and copies of the articles will be provided on the course
website.
Grading
Grades
will be determined on the basis of the exams (50%), presentation of papers and participation
in classroom discussion (40%), and attendance (10%). Grading in presentation
and participation in discussion will emphasize whether you have read the papers
carefully such that you can present the figures clearly and logically and your
willingness to discuss them more than the clarity of how you present and
discuss information. In other words, our emphasis is on getting you to think
about, criticize, interpret, and discuss scientific experiments without being
intimidated about speaking up.
Because this is a
small presentation/discussion class, being in the classroom itself is the major
part of the study. Students should make every effort to show up for every
class, particularly when your classmates are presenting and discussing papers. Attendance will be taken and counted in
the grade.
Exams
will cover concepts from both lectures and papers discussed, and may include
questions relating to the design of possible next
experiments based upon a paper covered in class, or precisely what can
be concluded from the data in a specific experiment (hypothetical or actual).